Beyond the typo
Find copy mistakes, broken links, mismatched visuals and claims that contradict the brand's own facts.
The independent QA layer for teams that publish
Typoshame reviews scheduled social content against the things your team actually knows: brand voice, dates, links, facts, images and the brief. Catch the issue while there is still time to fix it.
Human judgment stays in the loop. Review helps it arrive on time.
Scheduled social post · 10:30 AM
Meet the team behind our new webiste.
Spotted before publish. Your team stays in control of the fix.
Suggested: website01 / The problem
A post can be perfectly written and still have the wrong date, the wrong offer, the wrong image or the wrong brand voice. Great teams need a review layer that sees the context around the content.
Find copy mistakes, broken links, mismatched visuals and claims that contradict the brand's own facts.
Keep reference data, audience, voice and review policies close to each client instead of trusting one generic checklist.
Review scheduled posts while they can still be changed. Unresolved findings stay visible as publish time approaches.
Give your team specific, actionable findings. They decide what matters, what to fix and what is safe to ship.
02 / How it works
Typoshame fits into the gap between 'scheduled' and 'published'. It reviews the work, surfaces what needs attention and leaves the final call with your team.
Bring scheduled social posts in from Metricool without changing how your team plans content.
Add client context, reference facts and review rules so the checks have something real to compare against.
See specific issues in one inbox, with context and urgency attached. Resolve, mute or revisit them.
Slack or email nudges keep unresolved work from quietly crossing the publish line.
Everything that needs a second look
The post says Friday. The scheduled date is Thursday.
The offer differs from the client reference sheet.
A possible typo in the campaign headline.
A calm inbox for the issues that matter. Not another spreadsheet of blame.
03 / Built around your team
The best QA process is the one your team will actually use. Typoshame is designed to sit behind the scenes as your independent review layer, with findings your people can act on before a client or audience has to.
Keep scheduled campaigns moving while the small, expensive mistakes get a deliberate second look.
Give each client its own context and review policy. Make QA feel like part of your service, not a tool your client has to manage.
Bring the same pre-launch mindset to page copy, CTAs, links and brand facts. Talk to us about fitting Typoshame into your web QA workflow.
04 / The thinking behind it
People and systems make mistakes. A strong process has independent layers that catch them before they reach the people whose trust matters. Typoshame puts another layer in your publishing flow.
05 / Good questions
Clear answers help people decide whether a product fits their workflow.
No. A typo is only one kind of finding. Typoshame can review copy, media, dates, links and brand or business facts against the context you provide for each client.
No. It reviews scheduled content and surfaces issues for your team. People remain responsible for the decision and the edit.
Yes. Typoshame supports separate client contexts, review settings and an issue inbox. It is meant to strengthen the QA service your team already provides.
The live automated preflight starts with scheduled social content. The same risk-based review approach applies to website copy, links, CTAs and launch checks; tell us about your web workflow so we can shape the right fit.
Findings are meant to be actionable, not a pile of style opinions. Your team can resolve or mute issues, set client-specific context and keep human judgment in charge.
Ready when your team is
Tell us what you publish, where reviews get stuck and what your clients expect. We'll show you how Typoshame could fit the way your team works.